xthread: (Default)
xthread ([personal profile] xthread) wrote2006-12-12 10:34 am

Interesting statistic of the day...

From Bruce Schneier's article in Forbes about why we're stuck with spam so long as the underlying economics remain the same, the following interesting piece of information:

A 30-second prime-time television television ad costs 1.8 cents per adult viewer; a full-page color magazine ad about 0.9 cents per reader. A highway billboard costs 0.21 cents per car. Direct mail is the most expensive, at over 50 cents per third-class letter mailed... Typically, spammers charge less than a hundredth of a cent per recipient. And that number is what spamming houses charge their customers to deliver spam; if you're a clever hacker, you can build your own spam network for much less money.

[identity profile] plymouth.livejournal.com 2006-12-12 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I expect a lot fewer people have automatic filters to delete the billboard from their field of vision though :)

I suppose with TiVo and ReplayTV more people are acquiring the ability to filter on television...

[identity profile] xthread.livejournal.com 2006-12-12 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
My understanding is that Tivo is already mucking both with ad content and ad rates, as a side effect of viewers being able to filter out television ads..

[identity profile] toxgunn.livejournal.com 2006-12-13 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Although entertainingly not for lack of attention - not sure what Dr. Mann has been up to lately, but recall seeing a paper about ho0w his 'shades autodetected billboards and replaced those images with something more pleasant.