xthread: (Default)
xthread ([personal profile] xthread) wrote2006-12-12 10:34 am

Interesting statistic of the day...

From Bruce Schneier's article in Forbes about why we're stuck with spam so long as the underlying economics remain the same, the following interesting piece of information:

A 30-second prime-time television television ad costs 1.8 cents per adult viewer; a full-page color magazine ad about 0.9 cents per reader. A highway billboard costs 0.21 cents per car. Direct mail is the most expensive, at over 50 cents per third-class letter mailed... Typically, spammers charge less than a hundredth of a cent per recipient. And that number is what spamming houses charge their customers to deliver spam; if you're a clever hacker, you can build your own spam network for much less money.
kest: (southpark)

[personal profile] kest 2006-12-12 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
which is why we really need to be going after spammers' kneecaps much more than we currently are.

[identity profile] evilcyber.livejournal.com 2006-12-12 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
See above re: Russian approach.

Actually, see this instead:
http://mosnews.com/news/2005/07/25/spammerdead.shtml

[identity profile] xthread.livejournal.com 2006-12-12 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Ironically, I was most intrigued that adult fewers only cast 1.8 cents.