Would You Like A Windows Box With That?
Apr. 6th, 2006 02:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
xthreadApple seems to have figured out how to make hay out of Vista being late.
Since the Intel-based Macs were announced, we've been making bets on when people would figure out how to boot Windows on a Mac (something that theoretically neither Apple or Microsoft were going to support, and which Microsoft appeared to have some very good reasons not to), and whether Apple would support the effort. About two months ago, a couple of programmers claimed a bounty for having made Windows XP boot on current x86 Macs, and the question shifted to 'now that you can run, how will the OS vendors respond. Yesterday, Apple answered 'yes, please, feel free to run Windows on this hardware, in addition to MacOS,' by releasing Boot Camp, a boot loader that lets you boot your x86 Mac up as either environment (and presumably lets you share some amount of disk space between them). However, you're still not running both environments at the same time, which is really going to cut into your ability to play Temple of Elemental Evil at the same time that you've got your entire Mac environment up and running. Or your ability to run Visio and Project while you've got the rest of the Mac up, something that I often want to do.
This morning someone at the office sent around the next step, though, an app from some people called Parallels, that let's you run the Windows environment (or any other x86 environment, actually - Linux, NetBSD, Solaris...) at the same time, essentially in a window within the Mac environment. Voila, I can get my Visio, my Project, my Civ IV, my Temple of Elemental Evil, at the same time that I get a real (Unix) operating system and a reasonable desktop window system with apps designed by somebody that cares about them working well.
Now to figure out how (when) to fit a replacement laptop into the budget...
Note: Yes, I know, BootCamp and Parallels are only in Beta. So's GMail, get over it
Since the Intel-based Macs were announced, we've been making bets on when people would figure out how to boot Windows on a Mac (something that theoretically neither Apple or Microsoft were going to support, and which Microsoft appeared to have some very good reasons not to), and whether Apple would support the effort. About two months ago, a couple of programmers claimed a bounty for having made Windows XP boot on current x86 Macs, and the question shifted to 'now that you can run, how will the OS vendors respond. Yesterday, Apple answered 'yes, please, feel free to run Windows on this hardware, in addition to MacOS,' by releasing Boot Camp, a boot loader that lets you boot your x86 Mac up as either environment (and presumably lets you share some amount of disk space between them). However, you're still not running both environments at the same time, which is really going to cut into your ability to play Temple of Elemental Evil at the same time that you've got your entire Mac environment up and running. Or your ability to run Visio and Project while you've got the rest of the Mac up, something that I often want to do.
This morning someone at the office sent around the next step, though, an app from some people called Parallels, that let's you run the Windows environment (or any other x86 environment, actually - Linux, NetBSD, Solaris...) at the same time, essentially in a window within the Mac environment. Voila, I can get my Visio, my Project, my Civ IV, my Temple of Elemental Evil, at the same time that I get a real (Unix) operating system and a reasonable desktop window system with apps designed by somebody that cares about them working well.
Now to figure out how (when) to fit a replacement laptop into the budget...
Note: Yes, I know, BootCamp and Parallels are only in Beta. So's GMail, get over it
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 11:20 pm (UTC)Would an Athlon 64 whatever gain them any noticeable market share? Doubt it. It'd probably just drive up costs. But I don't know anything really. I just buy Macs so I can use them. Don't really care what's inside. And I'm a geek. Weird.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 11:46 pm (UTC)Strikes me as a step back to go to intel 32...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:10 am (UTC)The Intel Macs *will* go 64 bit in short order I suspect. Keep in mind that all of the machines released to date have been, essentially, laptops. The iMac and the Mini are both, basically, iBooks on the inside.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 11:49 pm (UTC)But I was already convinced I would not settle for a 32 bit box to upgrade my old pc...